RunningBobby McGee's Run:Walk ProtocolClick HERE for Bobby's Web Site ++++ Bobby is one of the finest coaches that I've had the pleasure of working with. If you get the chance to learn from him then take it! I have been using this for all of my runs since getting back to balanced training. It is working very well for me. ++++ Determining where to start with the walk run method would depend on your current level and volume of run conditioning. I generally subscribe the following guidelines: · If you run regularly (4+ X per week), then use for runs longer than 35 to 45:00 · For experienced runners I would suggest breaking up long runs & tempo runs (the latter defined as half marathon to marathon pace/effort – not off the bike, but flat pure runs) · I would also highly recommend using the method in your longer bricks where you run more than 35 – 45:00 off the bike · The basic model I use is 10:00 of running & 1:00 of walking, but I easily adapt this to suit the athlete’s capabilities. The following ranges are what I recommend from easiest to most skilled: 1. Phase 1: Beginner: This assumes no running at all prior to this. 1:00 run, 1:00 walk, build rapidly (weekly) to 5:00 run, 1:00 walk. 2. Phase II: This assumes low running volume (fewer than 4 runs per week) & looking to build volume. Add 10 – 15% to all runs weekly, but break runs up into 6 to 10:00 sections, with a 1:00 walk. If using 10% increases, then move closer to 10:00 run, 1:00 walk, if increasing by 15%, then stay closer to 6:00 run, 1:00 walk Our Run and Race Week WorkoutsOur Run Workouts are outlined in the attached Word file. If you have any suggestions, questions or amendments then please let us know. EC-R1_Easy Transition Run EC-R2_Steady Transition Run EC-R3_Poker Pacing Run EC-R4_Aerobic Run Test EC-R5_HIM Sim Opener Run EC-R6_Easy Run EC-R7_Steady Run 30 Runs in 30 Days
I think the concept of the 30 runs in 30 days originated with Molina. I certainly heard it first from Gordo that Molina suggested it to him. The idea seems simple; in reality, few people can actually accomplish the goal. I think the way it was originally described is nothing less than 45 minutes constituted a run and it had to be a continuous effort…no running part of it in the morning and part of it later. [Ed Note: Gordo used 30 minutes] I’ve adapted the challenge a bit. You have to understand the basic premise in order to maximize the potential opportunity of the challenge. The goal is to safely increase your frequency in running and improve your aerobic base. Given that, the 45 minute minimum shouldn’t apply to everyone. To that point, everyone’s minimum is different based upon their running background. The primary reason I believe people aren’t successful is from going too hard cardiovascularly. This has two results…one is mental/physiological burnout and the other is resultant musculoskeletal damage. We are wired to push ourselves…therefore, without wearing a hr monitor, people are repeatedly pushing above their aerobic ceiling and preventing adequate recovery. Advanced Run Camp TipsQuestion: I have been building up my running quite significantly (last week was 120km, this week is recovery so far less), but will have 3 more weeks of big miles on the run. What do you think of two long runs a week (one of 2h with AeT work and one around 2h30' over hills)? did it last week and a few times before, with no problems to recover...just feels stronger after each run. Usually first one on monday, second on thursday. running all the other days. Answer: I like that structure and have done up to three long runs in a 7-10 day period. When I was training for Ultraman, I once tried three long runs in a row (worked OK but you sure end up going slow!). Things to watch when when extending mileage as well as session duration:
It can take six months, or over a year (!), for the benefits of improved durability to show. What Really Happens in Ironman?Question: Reading race reports from various people, once again the common theme of losing significant time on the run appears. It is apparent even w/ people that claim to take the bike "easy" and are veteren IMers. What is the physiological change that occurs? Is it the accumulation of lactate, the depletion of muscluar energy stores (glycogen) or something else? If it is lactate, would not more training near LT help (which is what many people do and does not appear to help). Trying to put pieces of the puzzle together. -- Tondo Answer: For the run -- the key goal is to create a durable set of legs with outstanding overall aerobic fitness -- from a run point of view...
I'd say that's the bulk of it -- once you have that rolling then you can creep the overall steady-state running volume up. The next step after that is some faster work but that's pretty elite stuff. Most athletes are running so far below their existing run fitness that we are really looking to overall endurance (best trained on the bike) and durability (best trained with frequency). That's the way I see it. gordo Tips on Run TrainingQuestion: Mainly, in a stand alone marathon, most of the time, its my legs that give out. Weirdly, it doesn't happen in an ironman (to me), and it doesn't happen if I'm running a slower marathon (eg pacing somebody to a marathon about 30 minutes slower than my PB). But man am I sore after a marathon by itself. Is there a type of workout that would help this "muscular endurance"? I've tried a number of things- kilometer repeats, tempo runs (up to 45-50 minutes at LT pace), long runs, and my "boston special"- 5-6x 8 minutes, run at LT HR over rolling hills- in order to keep the HR up, you need to do keep pushing on the downhills. I think that generally the Boston Special lets me finish that bit of nastiness without the degree of trauma that others experience. But I use it for a specific course with a specific problem (long downhills). Do you have a suggestion for enhancing muscle endurance for the marathon distance? Thanks again Answer: As for the soreness, if you are racing close to your limit then, my experience, is that it comes with the territory. |



Brought to you by